VIA — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of VIA's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-06 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-12
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +39 | −21 | ~19 | 51 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | +1 | −1 | ~2 | 6 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | +3 | 0 | ~2 | 0 |
| Risk factors | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-06
business, reflecting our ability to acquire new customers and to grow our relationships with existing customers. Platform Annual Run-Rate Revenue has demonstrated rapid growth and was up 27% as of June 30, 2026, at $543 million, compared to $429 million as of June 30, 2025.
The increase in revenue was driven by continued growth in new customers as well as rapid expansion with existing customers. Our total customer count increased by 23%, from 689 as of June 30, 2025 to 847 as of June 30, 2026, including 94 customers added through the Downtowner acquisition which closed…
The increase in revenue was also driven by significant momentum with our customers located in the United States, where revenue increased by $26.6 million (or approximately 35% year-over-year) and the rest of the world excluding Germany which increased by $4.4 million (or approximately 46% year-over-…
Recurring subscription fees accounted for 95% of our revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to 98% during the same period in 2025. Revenue contribution from upfront implementation services, consulting contracts, and other one-time revenue represented 5% and 2% of our total revenu…
Gross margin increased from 39% in the three months ended June 30, 2025 to 41% in the three months ended June 30, 2026. The margin improvement was primarily attributable to a higher percentage of non-subscription revenue, which as noted above, increased from 2% of our total revenues in the three mon…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-12
Platform Annual Run-Rate Revenue has demonstrated rapid growth and was up 29% as of March 31, 2026, at $510 million, compared to $395 million as of March 31, 2025.
Comparison of the Three Months Ended March 31, 2026 and 2025
The increase in revenue was driven by continued growth in new customers as well as rapid expansion with existing customers. Our total customer count increased by 23%, from 682 as of March 31, 2025 to 838 as of March 31, 2026, including 94 customers added through the Downtowner acquisition which clos…
The increase in revenue was also driven by significant momentum with our customers located in the United States, where revenue increased by $24.8 million (or approximately 36% year-over-year) and the rest of the world excluding Germany which increased by $3.3 million (or approximately 36% year-over-…
Recurring subscription fees accounted for 99% of our revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2026, up from 95% during the same period in 2025. Revenue contribution from upfront implementation services, consulting contracts, and other one-time revenue represented 1% and 5% of our total revenues …
Market risk (Item 3)
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-06
To date, foreign currency transaction gains and losses have not been material to our consolidated financial statements. To mitigate a portion of our exposure to the Israeli Shekel, we have entered into foreign currency forward contracts to hedge certain forecasted cash flows denominated in the Israe…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-12
To date, foreign currency transaction gains and losses have not been material to our consolidated financial statements, and we do not currently hedge against the risks associated with currency fluctuations. We may in the future hedge our foreign currency exposure and may use currency forward contrac…
Legal proceedings
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-06
On June 5, 2026, a putative labor and employment class action, captioned Faison v. Nomad Transit LLC and Via Transportation, Inc., No. 2:26-cv-06165, was filed against our Company in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.
On June 10, 2026, a putative securities class action, captioned Garlesky v. Via Transportation, Inc., et al, No. 1:26-cv-04870, was filed against the Company, our principal executive officer, and principal financial officer, individual Board members and underwriters in the in the U.S. District Court…
Although the Company disagrees with the allegations set forth in the putative class actions and intends to vigorously defend against them, there are inherent uncertainties in litigation and litigation matters present a wide range of potential outcomes. As a result of these uncertainties any possible…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice