VSBC — what changed in the latest 10-K
A section-by-section comparison of VSBC's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-K · 2026-06-17 vs the prior 10-K · 2026-06-08
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~4 | 76 |
| Risk factors | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~6 | 62 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 18 |
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +7 | −13 | ~14 | 21 |
| Market risk (Item 7A) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 16 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-K · 2026-06-17
Operating expenses were $385,411 for the year ended January 31, 2026, compared with $679,914 for the year ended January 31, 2025. For the years ended January 31, 2026, and 2025, the operating expenses were primarily attributed to professional fees of $125,673 and $180,700, stock-based compensation o…
We did not record a current income tax provision on our operating losses for the years ended January 31, 2026, and 2025, due to our net operating loss position and a full valuation allowance against deferred tax assets. However, during the years ended January 31, 2026, and 2025, we recognized $29,95…
We had a net loss of $415,368 for the year ended January 31, 2026, compared to $774,922 for the year ended January 31, 2025. The decrease in net loss of $359,554 was primarily due to lower operating expenses, including reductions in professional fees, lease expenses, stock-based compensation, salary…
We did not record a current income tax provision on our operating losses for the years ended January 31, 2026, and 2025, due to our net operating loss position and a full valuation allowance against deferred tax assets.
However, during the years ended January 31, 2026, and 2025, we recognized $29,957 and $95,008, respectively, in interest and penalties on historical income tax obligations relating to fiscal year 2022. In accordance with ASC 740-10-45-25, these amounts are classified as income tax expense in our sta…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-K · 2026-06-08
We did not record a current income tax provision on our operating losses for the years ended January 31, 2025 and 2024, due to our net operating loss position and a full valuation allowance against deferred tax assets. However, during the year ended January 31, 2025, we recognized $95,008 in interes…
We had a net loss of $774,922 for the year ended January 31, 2025, compared to $1,118,562 for the year ended January 31, 2024. The decrease in net loss of $343,640 was due to a reduction in operating expenses of $438,648 offset by provision for income taxes of $95,008.
The income tax payable balance primarily relates to historical tax liabilities, and no current income tax expense was recognized due to our net operating loss position and full valuation allowance. During the year ended January 31, 2025, we recognized $95,008 interest and penalty payable related to …
The following table summarizes our cash flows for the years ended January 31, 2025, and 2024:
We evaluate financial assets measured at amortized cost, including accounts receivable, for expected credit losses under ASC 326. The estimate incorporates historical loss experience, current economic conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Changes in these factors could materially aff…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice