WASH — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of WASH's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-06 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-07
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +23 | −24 | ~86 | 119 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 0 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-06
(Dollars in thousands)Average BalanceInterestYield/ RateAverage BalanceInterestYield/ RateAverage BalanceInterestYield/ Rate
Interest income amounts presented in the preceding table include the following adjustments for taxable equivalency:
Net interest income, the primary source of our operating income, totaled $41.8 million and $82.3 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $37.2 million and $73.6 million, respectively, for the same periods in 2025.
The improvement in net interest income, FTE net interest income and NIM discussed below largely reflected continued benefits from the December 2024 balance sheet repositioning transactions, as well as the cessation of amortization of a deferred loss associated with a previously terminated cash flow …
Total average loan balances for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 decreased by $116.5 million and $69.4 million, respectively, from the comparable 2025 periods, reflecting decreases in the residential and commercial real estate loan portfolios. The yield on total loans for the three and s…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
Net interest income, the primary source of our operating income, totaled $40.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to $36.4 million, for the same period in 2025.
The improvement in net interest income, FTE net interest income and NIM discussed below largely reflected continued benefits from the December 2024 balance sheet repositioning transactions.
Total average loan balances for the three months ended March 31, 2026 decreased by $21.8 million from the comparable 2025 period, largely reflecting a decrease in the residential real estate loan portfolio. The yield on total loans for the three months ended March 31, 2026 was 5.14%, down by 17 basi…
FHLB advances and brokered time deposits are utilized as wholesale funding sources. The average balance of FHLB advances for the three months ended March 31, 2026 decreased by $299.2 million from the comparable period in 2025. The average rate paid on such advances for the three months ended March 3…
Average in-market interest-bearing deposits, which excludes wholesale brokered deposits, for the three months ended March 31, 2026 increased by $279.1 million from the same period in 2025, largely reflecting increases in average balances of savings accounts and interest-bearing demand deposits. The …
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice