WNLVvs its industry peers
A metric-by-metric comparison of WNLV against SIC 7812 — valuation, growth, profitability, quality and total return, with each figure's rank within the peer group. Every value is Go-computed from SEC filings and delayed prices; ranks are sorted positions within the group only — descriptive, not advice.
| Company | Market cap | P/E (TTM) | P/B | P/S | Revenue growth (YoY) | Earnings growth (YoY) | EBIT margin | ROE | ROIC | Piotroski F | 1y total return | Dividend yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WNLVThis | — | — | — | — | 1.4%#3 | -1291.7%#6 | -735.5%#6 | — | — | — | — | — |
| FUBO | $3.7B#1 | — | 5.4x#4 | 9.3x#5 | -70.6%#6 | 40.1%#2 | -48.7%#3 | -25.0%#2 | -39.6%#2 | — | — | — |
| ANGX | $984M#2 | — | — | 3.1x#4 | 233.2%#1 | -93.1%#4 | -51.0%#4 | — | — | — | -67.5%#2 | — |
| STRZ | $465M#3 | — | 1.6x#3 | 0.3x#2 | -1.6%#4 | 76.9%#1 | -12.4%#1 | -71.4%#3 | -20.0%#1 | — | 81.4%#1 | — |
| TOON | $35M#4 | 7.0x#1 | 0.7x#2 | 0.9x#3 | 20.7%#2 | -18.3%#3 | -32.8%#2 | -0.0%#1 | — | 4#1 | — | — |
| MPU | $7M#5 | — | 0.4x#1 | 0.3x#1 | -27.9%#5 | -286.1%#5 | -110.8%#5 | -189.8%#4 | — | — | — | — |
Peer set: US filers sharing this company's SEC industry classification (SIC 7812). SIC is coarse — conglomerates and multi-segment companies map imperfectly. Values from SEC filings + delayed prices; ranks are within-group positions only. Market cap, P/E, P/B, P/S, 1y total return and dividend yield are computed from each member's latest snapshot price when the table is built (see as-of; snapshot prices can lag) — not live. Some peers are still being computed, so this table covers part of the group and ranks are within the rows shown; it fills in shortly. This table timed out mid-build, so it covers part of the group; ranks are within the rows shown and it fills in shortly. Table built 2026-09-16.
Source: SEC XBRL filings + delayed prices · ranks are within-group positions · For reference only · Not investment advice