WOOF — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of WOOF's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-09-04 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-06-05
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +14 | −12 | ~9 | 27 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 3 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 3 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Legal proceedings
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-09-04
an increase in net sales to $1.49 billion, and a comparable sales increase of 0.6%;
an increase in Adjusted EBITDA from $113.9 million to $122.2 million, inclusive of a $6.8 million net incremental tariff refund.
As a percentage of net sales, our gross profit rate was 39.7% for the thirteen weeks ended August 1, 2026 compared with 39.3% for the thirteen weeks ended August 2, 2025. As a percentage of net sales, our gross profit rate was 39.0% for the twenty-six weeks ended August 1, 2026 compared with 38.7% f…
As a percentage of net sales, SG&A expenses were 36.5% for the thirteen weeks ended August 1, 2026 compared with 36.4% for the thirteen weeks ended August 2, 2025. The increase in SG&A expenses between the periods was primarily due to an increase in advertising and depreciation expense, along with a…
As a percentage of net sales, SG&A expenses were 36.6% for the twenty-six weeks ended August 1, 2026 compared with 36.8% for the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2025. The decrease in SG&A expenses between the periods was primarily due to lower payroll, other compensation, and consulting costs, part…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-06-05
On February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision invalidating certain tariffs previously imposed under the International Emergency Economic Power Act ("IEEPA"). We have applied for a refund of tariffs paid, following the processes established by U.S. Customs and Border Protection. We w…
an increase in net sales from $1.49 billion to $1.50 billion, representing period-over-period growth of 0.2% and a comparable sales increase of 0.7%;
an increase in Adjusted EBITDA from $89.4 million to $97.3 million.
As a percentage of net sales, our gross profit rate was 38.4% for the thirteen weeks ended May 2, 2026 compared with 38.2% for the thirteen weeks ended May 3, 2025. We continue to focus on effectively utilizing our services footprint and managing our inventory, unit costs, pricing, and promotional s…
As a percentage of net sales, SG&A expenses were 36.7% for the thirteen weeks ended May 2, 2026 compared with 37.1% for the thirteen weeks ended May 3, 2025. The decrease in SG&A expenses between the periods was primarily due to lower payroll and consulting costs, partially offset by an increase in …
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice