WWD — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of WWD's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-04-30 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-02-04
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +40 | −33 | ~14 | 63 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Risk factors | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +1 | −2 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-04-30
On February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act ("IEEPA") were not authorized by the statute, although it did not establish a process for recovery. Subsequent cases were filed after the U.S. Supreme Court ruling, which res…
In March 2026, in response to the military conflict between the United States and Iran, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (“NATO”) members (including the United States) announced targeted economic sanctions on Iran and Iranian enterprises. Fluctuations in oil prices resulting from the conflict …
On January 12, 2026, the Company approved a plan to wind-down its on-highway natural gas truck manufacturing operations in China (the “China OH Business”). This decision follows prior unsuccessful efforts to divest the China OH Business and is a strategic step to align the Industrial segment portfol…
In connection with this action, we have incurred $6,815 in the three months ended March 31, 2026 and expect to incur pre-tax charges of approximately $13,000 for the remainder of fiscal year 2026. The majority of these charges are expected to be recognized in the third quarter of fiscal year 2026, a…
Adjusted net earnings, adjusted earnings per share, adjusted effective tax rate, EBIT, adjusted EBIT, EBITDA, and adjusted EBITDA are non-U.S. GAAP financial measures. A description of these measures as well as a reconciliation of these non-U.S. GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparabl…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-02-04
expectations regarding demand for our products, in particular our expectations with respect to natural gas trucks in China;
On January 12, 2026, the Company approved a plan to wind-down our on-highway natural gas truck manufacturing operations in China (the “China OH Business”). This decision follows prior unsuccessful efforts to divest the China OH Business and is a strategic step to align the Industrial segment portfol…
In connection with this action, we expect to incur pre-tax charges of approximately $20,000 to $25,000. The majority of these charges are expected to be recognized in the second and third quarters of fiscal year 2026.
Adjusted net earnings, adjusted earnings per share, adjusted effective tax rate, EBIT, adjusted EBIT, EBITDA, and adjusted EBITDA are non-U.S. GAAP financial measures. A description of these measures as well as a reconciliation of these
non-U.S. GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP financial measures can be found under the caption “Non-U.S. GAAP Financial Measures” in this Item 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-04-30
During the three months ended March 31, 2026, no other directors or officers, as defined in Rule 16a-1(f), adopted or terminated a “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or a “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement,” each as defined in Item 408 of Regulation S-K.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-02-04
On December 2, 2025, Shawn McLevige, President, Aerospace, entered into a trading plan pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 of the Exchange Act intended to satisfy the affirmative defense of Rule 10b5-1(c) of the Exchange Act. The new trading plan provides for the sale of up to 4,000 shares of common stock of th…
During the three months ended December 31, 2025, no other directors or officers, as defined in Rule 16a-1(f), adopted or terminated a “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or a “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement,” each as defined in Item 408 of Regulation S-K .
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice