XPON — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of XPON's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-10 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-15
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +24 | −14 | ~12 | 52 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~3 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | +1 | −1 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | Text added/removed | 0 | −12 | ~1 | 0 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-10
In May 2026, the Company announced an expansion of its existing supply relationship with Forest River, Inc. ("Forest River"), a subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway and one of the largest manufacturers of recreational vehicles in North America. Building on its existing supply arrangements with Forest Ri…
Net sales for the three months ended June 30, 2026 decreased by $1.0 million, or 32.1%, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2025. Sales were $2.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and $3.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025.
Net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2026 decreased by $1.4 million, or 28.6%, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025. Sales were $3.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and $5.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025.
The decrease was primarily due to discontinuing resale of certain low-margin accessories in order to increase our profit margins. Additionally, certain OEM customers entered the period carrying elevated battery inventory levels built up through year-end, which tempered order volume early in the year…
Total cost of sales for the three months ended June 30, 2026 decreased by $1.0 million, or 42.1%, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2025. Cost of sales was $1.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and $2.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025. Cost of sales as a pe…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-15
Also in February 2026, we entered into a strategic partnership with Dealer Accessory Supply (“DAS”) related to the launch of the DASGen Hybrid Energy Storage System, representing our entry into the industrial energy storage market. DASGen is designed to function as an energy buffer between diesel ge…
Net sales for the three months ended March 31, 2026 decreased by $0.5 million, or 24%, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025. Net sales were $1.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and $2.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The decrease was primarily due t…
Total cost of sales for the three months ended March 31, 2026 decreased by $0.4 million, or 24%, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025. Cost of sales as a percent of sales decreased by 0.8 percentage points compared to the prior year period, from 75.5% to 74.7%. Cost of sales was $1.2 mi…
Our gross profit for the three months ended March 31, 2026 decreased by $0.1 million, or 21%, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025. Gross profit was $0.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025. Gross profit as a perce…
Selling, general, and administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2026 increased by $0.5 million, or 31%, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025. Selling, general, and administrative expenses were $2.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and $1.6 million for…
Legal proceedings
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-10
On January 29, 2026, we received a determination from the Staff that the bid price of the common stock had closed below the Minimum Bid Price Requirement and that the Staff had determined to delist our securities from The Nasdaq Capital Market, subject to a compliance period expiring on July 28, 202…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-15
On January 29, 2026, we received a determination from the Staff that the bid price of the common stock had closed below the $1.00 minimum required by Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2) for the prior 30 consecutive business days (the “Minimum Bid Price Requirement”) and that the Staff had determined to d…
Risk factors
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-15
We face risks associated with pursuing strategic acquisitions and divestitures, and our failure to successfully integrate any acquired business or product could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial position.
As part of our overall strategy, we may periodically consider strategic acquisitions to expand our brands into complementary product categories and markets, or to acquire new technologies, intellectual property, or other assets. Our ability to do so depends on our ability to identify and successfull…
●expose us to risks inherent in entering into a new market or geographic region;
●lose significant customers or key personnel of the acquired business;
●encounter difficulties managing and implementing acquired assets;
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice