ZSPC — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of ZSPC's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-14 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-15
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +48 | −21 | ~34 | 49 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +1 | −2 | ~2 | 4 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
| Risk factors | Some risk factors updated | +8 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-14
To monitor our ability to retain and grow our customer base for our software we monitor the annualized contract value of active software licenses, with particular attention to customers with at least $50,000 in ACV. Our ACV for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 was approximately $9.4 milli…
Dollar-Based Retention Rate as of a given period end by starting with the ACV from all customers as of 12 months prior to such period end (“Prior Period ACV”) and calculating the ACV from these same customers as of the current period end (“Current Period ACV”). Current Period ACV includes any upsell…
We measure the ACV dollar-weighted term length of our renewable software license agreements. We believe an increase in term length is a signal that customers are adopting our products for long-term use, which decreases the risk that a customer will choose not to renew their software licenses. CTE ag…
service type does not significantly impact the functionality of the others, or the hardware/software being provided. Services are typically invoiced in advance and revenue is recognized based on the passage of time during the contract period. We believe that the passage of time corresponds directly …
Gain from settlement of vendor claims — Gain from settlement of vendor claims consists of litigation matters relating to former vendors, for which the vendor customer relationship has previously ceased.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-15
To monitor our ability to retain and grow our customer base for our software we monitor the annualized contract value of active software licenses, with particular attention to customers with at least $50,000 in ACV. Our ACV for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 was approximately $10.1 m…
We measure the ACV dollar-weighted term length of our renewable software license agreements. We believe, an increase in term length is a signal that customers are adopting our products for long-term use, which decreases the risk that a customer will choose not to renew their software licenses. CTE a…
For the three months ended March 31, 2026, operating expenses decreased by $1.9 million, or 22%, to $6.7 million from $8.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The decrease in expenses was primarily due to decreased costs in personnel expenses, travel related expenses and consulting ex…
Research and development expenses decreased by $0.1 million or 9%, to $1.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026, from $1.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The decrease in expenses was primarily attributable to a decrease in compensation costs resulting from lower head…
Selling and marketing expenses decreased by $1.6 million or 40%, to $2.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026, from $4.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The decrease in expenses was mainly due to lower compensation and commission expenses associated with the reduced s…
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-14
The Company has identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2026, relating to: (i) the lack of segregation of duties; (ii) account reconciliation and cutoff; and (iii) the lack of a formal risk assessment policy for entity level controls. As such, m…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-15
The Company has identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2026, relating to: (i) the lack of segregation of duties; (ii) account reconciliation and cutoff; and (iii) the lack of a formal risk
assessment policy for entity level controls. As such, management determined that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e) under the Exchange Act) were not effective as of March 31, 2026.
Risk factors
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-14
Our common stock has been suspended from trading on Nasdaq and will be delisted, which has reduced the liquidity of our common stock and may impair our ability to raise capital.
On April 21, 2026, we received a determination from Nasdaq to delist our common stock under Nasdaq Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(A)(iii), following the closing bid price of our common stock being $0.10 or less for ten consecutive trading days. Trading in our common stock was suspended at the opening of bu…
Since April 28, 2026, our common stock has been quoted on the OTC Markets rather than on a national securities exchange. Quotation on the OTC Markets is generally characterized by wider spreads between bid and asked prices, lower trading volume, greater price volatility and less publicly available i…
Delisting has other consequences. Our common stock will cease to be a “covered security” for purposes of the National Securities Markets Improvement Act, so that future issuances of our common stock will be subject to the securities laws of individual states rather than federal preemption, which may…
We have issued a substantial number of shares of common stock, and we have limited authorized share capacity available to satisfy our obligations under our outstanding convertible securities.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice