CAVA — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of CAVA's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-12 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-20
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +30 | −9 | ~10 | 33 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | −4 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-12
The increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to investments to support future growth and higher equity-based compensation, partially offset by costs associated with our CAVA Connect conference in the prior year quarter. As a percentage of revenue, general and administrative …
The increase in pre-opening costs was due to the volume of new CAVA restaurants under construction and additional investments in new restaurant openings to support increased volumes.
The effective tax rate for the twelve weeks ended July 12, 2026 and July 13, 2025 was 24.7% and 22.5%, respectively, which includes the impact of a $2.0 million and $1.7 million reduction to income tax expense associated with equity-based compensation, respectively.
The following table summarizes remaining activity related to our CPG operations and the production of dips, spreads, and certain dressing bases used in CAVA restaurants:
The increase in revenue noted above was primarily due to higher CPG sales. As a percentage of revenue, food, beverage, and packaging increased due to higher freight costs, partially offset by lower raw material input costs.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-20
The increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to investments to support future growth, higher performance-based incentive compensation, and higher equity-based compensation. As a percentage of revenue, general and administrative expenses decreased primarily due to leverage fr…
The increase in pre-opening costs was due to a higher volume of new CAVA restaurants under construction.
The increase in impairment and asset disposal costs was primarily due to impairment charges related to certain operating lease assets and property and equipment, net.
The increase in other income, net, was primarily due to the fair value change recognized on a convertible promissory note described in Item 1, Financial Statements, Note 3 (Investments).
The effective income tax rate for the sixteen weeks ended April 19, 2026 and April 20, 2025 was 21.5% and (26.3)%, which include the impact of a $2.2 million and $10.7 million reduction to income tax expense associated with equity-based compensation, respectively.
Other information
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-20
Maximum Number of Securities to be Sold Pursuant to the Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plan
* The Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement may terminate earlier than the scheduled termination date if all transactions under the trading arrangement are completed.
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers
On May 15, 2026, the Company entered into a Separation Agreement and General Release with Kenneth R. Bertram, which contains certain severance benefits, as more particularly described under the heading “Separation Agreement with Robert Bertram” in the Company's Proxy Statement filed on April 24, 202…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice