EPAM — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of EPAM's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-06 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-07
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +17 | −11 | ~22 | 37 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~5 | 5 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 2 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +1 | −1 | 0 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-06
(1)Includes $22,833 and $18,161 of stock-based compensation expense for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, and $45,686 and $42,084 of stock-based compensation expense for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
(2)Includes $23,568 and $20,397 of stock-based compensation expense for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, and $50,634 and $44,930 of stock-based compensation expense for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
During the six months ended June 30, 2026, our total revenues increased by 6.0% to $2.815 billion compared to the corresponding period in 2025. During the six months ended June 30, 2026 as compared to the same period last year, revenues have been positively impacted by improving demand for our servi…
Revenues by client location for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 were as follows:
(in thousands, except percentages)(in thousands, except percentages)
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
(1)Includes $22,853 and $23,923 of stock-based compensation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
(2)Includes $27,066 and $24,533 of stock-based compensation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
Revenues by client location for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 were as follows:
Selling, general and administrative expenses represent expenditures associated with promoting and selling our services and general and administrative functions of our business. These expenses include the costs of salaries, bonuses, fringe benefits, stock-based compensation, severance, bad debt, trav…
During the three months ended March 31, 2026, selling, general and administrative expenses were $239.7 million representing a 9.5% increase as compared to $218.9 million in the corresponding period of 2025. The increase was mainly driven by increased personnel-related costs, which included impacts f…
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-06
During the quarter ended June 30, 2026, none of our directors or officers informed us of the adoption or termination of a “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” as those terms are defined in Regulation S-K, Item 408.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
On March 13, 2026, Arkadiy Dobkin, Executive Chair, through a revocable trust that he controls, entered into a trading arrangement for the sale of securities of the Company’s common stock that is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Securities Exchange Act Rule 10b5-1(c) (a “Rul…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice