CNTX 最新10-Q变化
将 CNTX 最新的定期申报(10-K/10-Q)与上一份同类型申报逐章节对比:每个章节新增/删除的段落数与原文摘录。全部为确定性文本对比——无相似度评分、无方向判断、非投资建议。
对比:10-Q · 2026-05-06 与上一份 10-Q · 2025-11-05
| 章节 | 结果 | 新增 | 删除 | 微调 | 未变 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 管理层讨论与分析 | 文字有新增/删除 | +12 | −17 | ~25 | 36 |
| 市场风险(第3项) | 无段落级文字变化 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 控制与程序 | 文字有新增/删除 | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 1 |
| 法律诉讼 | 文字有新增/删除 | +5 | −1 | ~1 | 0 |
| 风险因素 | 公司称无重大变化(指向 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| 其他信息 | 文字有新增/删除 | 0 | −7 | ~1 | 0 |
计数单位为段落;"新增/删除"指相对上一份文件新增/删除的文字,不含方向或好坏判断。
代表性摘录
每个章节最多 5 条、每条约 300 字符的原文摘录,直接来自两份 SEC 文件。
管理层讨论与分析
相对上期新增的文字 · 来源:10-Q · 2026-05-06
CTIM-76: Integral Molecular Collaboration and Licensing Agreement
In April 2021, we entered into a collaboration and licensing agreement with Integral Molecular, Inc. (“Integral”) (the “Integral License Agreement”) for the development of a CLDN6 bsAb for cancer therapy. On February 29, 2024, we further amended (the "Second Amendment") the Research Collaboration an…
amended) with Integral to reflect updated financial terms. In the course of our further due diligence review of CTIM-76, we determined that certain of the licensed rights under the Integral License Agreement may incorporate intellectual property rights currently held by a third party. Specifically, …
CTIM-76 expenditures increased by $1.2 million primarily due to an increase of $1.1 million in clinical costs related to the CTIM-76 Phase 1 trial. CT-95 expenses increased by $0.6 million primarily due to an increase of $0.9 million in clinical costs related to the CT-95 Phase 1 trial, which were p…
General and administrative expenses increased by approximately $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026 as compared to the same period in 2025. The increase was primarily driven by a $0.2 million increase in salaries and personnel related costs, mainly as a result of higher share-based…
相对上期删除的文字 · 来源:10-Q · 2025-11-05
In April 2021, we entered into a collaboration and licensing agreement with Integral Molecular, Inc. (“Integral”) (the “Integral License Agreement”) for the development of a CLDN6 BsAb for cancer therapy. On February 29, 2024, we further amended (the "Second Amendment") the Research Collaboration an…
United States and certain foreign jurisdictions expiring in January 2034, and then in 2025 became aware of a patent that issued in the United States expiring in March 2042, in each instance that potentially covers certain parts of the intellectual property included in CTIM-76.While we believe we wil…
CTIM-76 expenditures increased by $0.2 million due to an increase of $0.6 million in clinical costs, partially offset by a decrease of $0.4 million in preclinical and contract manufacturing costs. CT-95 expense of $1.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2025 primarily represents $1.0 m…
General and administrative expenses did not materially change for the three months ended September 30, 2025 as compared to the same period in 2024.
Comparison of the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2025 and 2024
法律诉讼
相对上期新增的文字 · 来源:10-Q · 2026-05-06
On February 4, 2026, the Vladimir Gusinsky Revocable Trust filed a stockholder class action complaint (the “Action”) against us and our directors in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (the “Court”) asserting that (i) Article V, Section 2 of our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorpo…
On February 24, 2026, a stipulation and proposed consent judgment (the “Stipulated Judgment”) was filed with the Court regarding the Action, and on March 11, 2026, the Court approved the Stipulated Judgment, pursuant to which Article V, Section 2 and Article VI, Section 1 of the Certificate of Incor…
On April 30, 2026, the Company entered into a letter agreement (the “Letter Agreement”), pursuant to which a third party service provider (the “Provider”) of the Company agreed to pay the Mootness Fee (as defined below) in full on behalf of the Company.
On April 30, 2026, the Court granted a Stipulation and Proposed Order Closing the Case (the “Stipulated Order”). The Stipulated Order requires the payment of $850,000 in fees and expenses to plaintiff’s counsel in the Action (the “Mootness Fee”). The Court was not asked to review, and did not pass j…
On May 1, 2026, the Provider paid the Mootness Fee in full pursuant to the Letter Agreement. The Action will be closed after the Court is informed a quorum was achieved at the Company’s 2026 annual meeting of stockholders, which is scheduled to be held on June 24, 2026.
相对上期删除的文字 · 来源:10-Q · 2025-11-05
are not presently a party to any material legal proceedings.
其他信息
相对上期删除的文字 · 来源:10-Q · 2025-11-05
On November 7, 2022, we entered into a License Agreement (the “CTIM-76 Lonza License Agreement”) with Lonza Sales AG (“Lonza”) related to CTIM-76. On November 3, 2025, we amended the CTIM-76 Lonza License Agreement (the
“First CTIM-76 License Amendment”) with Lonza to clarify the intent of certain provisions and to update certain of the licensed rights described in the appendices to the CTIM-76 Lonza License Agreement.
On November 3, 2025, we entered into a License Agreement (the “CT-202 Lonza License Agreement”) with Lonza related to CT-202 in connection with the Development and Manufacturing Services Agreement between Lonza, Lonza AG and the Company, dated as of November 7, 2022 and as amended on January 9, 2025…
We shall pay certain royalties and annual payments in respect of the manufacturing and sale of CT-202, which amounts shall be determined by the party manufacturing CT-202 and include a potential annual payment of less than $500,000 and a royalty on net sales in a range between 0% and a low single di…
The CT-202 Lonza License Agreement continues until terminated, and we or Lonza may terminate the CT-202 Lonza License Agreement for uncured material breaches or insolvency of the other party. We can unilaterally terminate the CT-202 Lonza License Agreement with prior written notice to Lonza, and Lon…
如何读 10-Q 的风险因素(第 1A 项)
10-Q 的风险因素章节有三种常见形态,本页按其一分类展示:
- 指向(pointer) — 公司仅声明"无重大变化"并指向年度 10-K 的完整风险因素;本季没有自己的风险文本可对比。
- 部分更新(partial) — 公司写明"除下述外无重大变化",只更新部分风险;摘录展示的正是本季新增的内容。
- 全文重述(restated) — 本季重新给出完整风险因素。若上一季只是"指向",则无法逐段对比,本页会将其标为"本季全文重述"。
这只是对文件结构的客观描述,不构成对风险高低的判断。
数据来自 SEC EDGAR 两份申报文件的文本级对比 · 确定性计算(无 AI 生成内容)· 仅供参考 · 非投资建议