RCD 最新10-Q变化

相对上期新增的文字 · 来源:10-Q · 2026-08-07

• Broadmark State Court Litigation and the lead plaintiff in the Broadmark Federal Court Litigation (defined below)

• jointly moved for class certification and to be appointed co-class representatives in the Broadmark State Court Litigation.

• On July 1, 2026, the defendants filed their opposition to the class certification motion. Briefing on the plaintiffs’ class

• certification motion is expected to be completed by September 2026.

• completed on February 5, 2026. On May 1, 2026, the lead plaintiff in the Broadmark Federal Court Litigation and the

相对上期删除的文字 · 来源:10-Q · 2026-05-08

• On June 6, 2024, a purported former stockholder of Broadmark filed a class action lawsuit in the Circuit Court for

• Baltimore City, Maryland, captioned Eibling v. Pyatt, et al., No. C-24-CV-24-000818 (Md. Cir. Ct. Balt. City), (the

• “Broadmark Merger Action”). The Broadmark Merger Action named as defendants Broadmark’s former board of

• directors and alleged they breached their fiduciary duties in connection with the Broadmark Merger by failing to

• properly consider acquisition proposals that were purportedly superior to the Broadmark Merger, by relying on

相对上期删除的文字 · 来源:10-Q · 2026-05-08

• On May 6, 2026, Adam Zausmer and the Company entered into a Separation and Consulting Agreement (the “Zausmer

• Agreement”) in connection with the previously announced mutual separation of Mr. Zausmer and the Company on

• February 26, 2026 (the “Separation Date”). Under the Zausmer Agreement and in connection with Mr. Zausmer’s past

• service to the Company, Mr. Zausmer is entitled to receive a one-time cash payment of $1,250,000, full reimbursement

• of COBRA premiums for himself and his eligible dependents for up to 18 months, starting from the Separation Date,