KMB vs PG
KMB and PG side by side — valuation & fundamentals (public data).
Key statistics
| Metric | KMBKIMBERLY CLARK CORP | PGPROCTER & GAMBLE Co |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $35.60B | $375.72B |
| P/E (TTM) | 18.2 | 24.4 |
| P/B | 20.34 | 6.79 |
| P/S | 2.2x | 4.3x |
| Dividend yield | 4.66% | 2.72% |
| Revenue | $16.58B(TTM) | $87.92B(TTM) |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -2.1% | 3.3% |
| Net income | $1.96B(TTM) | $16.03B(TTM) |
| Earnings growth (YoY) | -20.6% | 0.5% |
| EPS, diluted | $5.87(TTM) | $6.64(TTM) |
| EBIT margin | 14.3% | 22.7% |
| ROE | 115.5% | 29.0% |
| ROIC | 24.3% | 18.4% |
| Piotroski F | 5/9 | — |
| 1y total return | +9.7% | +12.5% |
Figures from SEC filings · for reference only · not investment advice
Growth of $10,000: KMB vs PG
| Metric | KMB | PG |
|---|---|---|
| End value | $11.3K | $25.5K |
| Total return | +12.5% | +154.7% |
| CAGR | +1.1% | +9.5% |
| Volatility | 21.4% | 18.9% |
| Sharpe | -0.04 | 0.35 |
| Sortino | -0.05 | 0.50 |
| Max drawdown | -34.1% | -23.8% |
Based on 2600 common trading days, 2016-07-01 → 2026-11-03 · risk-free 4.21% (current short-Treasury, held constant)
A head-to-head total-return backtest over real split- and dividend-adjusted prices: how a one-time $10,000 investment in each stock, held to today, would have grown over their common window — including reinvested dividends. A disclosed historical statistic — NOT a prediction, a guarantee, or investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results.
Related comparisons
Delayed data · Public sources · For reference only · Not investment advice (this page declares no winner)