KMB vs PG
KMB and PG side by side — valuation & fundamentals (public data).
Key statistics
| Metric | KMBKIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION | PGThe Procter & Gamble Company |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $35.60B | $339.81B |
| P/E (TTM) | 18.2 | 22.1 |
| P/B | 20.35 | 6.26 |
| P/S | 2.2x | 3.9x |
| Dividend yield | 4.66% | 3.01% |
| Revenue | $16.58B(TTM) | $87.03B(TTM) |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -2.1% | 3.3% |
| Net income | $1.96B(TTM) | $16.05B(TTM) |
| Earnings growth (YoY) | -20.6% | 0.5% |
| EPS, diluted | $5.87(TTM) | $6.62(TTM) |
| EBIT margin | 14.3% | 22.7% |
| ROE | 115.5% | 29.5% |
| ROIC | 24.3% | 19.8% |
| Piotroski F | 5/9 | — |
| 1y total return | -13.0% | -4.6% |
Figures from SEC filings · for reference only · not investment advice
Growth of $10,000: KMB vs PG
| Metric | KMB | PG |
|---|---|---|
| End value | $12.3K | $24.1K |
| Total return | +22.5% | +141.5% |
| CAGR | +2.0% | +8.9% |
| Volatility | 21.1% | 18.7% |
| Sharpe | 0.01 | 0.34 |
| Sortino | 0.02 | 0.48 |
| Max drawdown | -34.1% | -23.8% |
Based on 2600 common trading days, 2016-04-29 → 2026-09-01 · risk-free 3.92% (current short-Treasury, held constant)
A head-to-head total-return backtest over real split- and dividend-adjusted prices: how a one-time $10,000 investment in each stock, held to today, would have grown over their common window — including reinvested dividends. A disclosed historical statistic — NOT a prediction, a guarantee, or investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results.
Related comparisons
Delayed data · Public sources · For reference only · Not investment advice (this page declares no winner)