Tickwind
TodayOpportunitiesMarketsAI Chat
EN
Log inSign up
Tickwind

Read every tick. See where the market's blowing.

  • X
  • TelegramChinese
  • Newsletter

Product

  • Markets
  • Theme Zones
  • All stocks
  • Compare
  • Hot stocks
  • Opportunities
  • News
  • Discussion
  • Watchlist
  • What's new

Account

  • Settings
  • Newsletter
  • For writers
  • MCP server
  • Contact
  • Log in
  • Sign up
MarketsTheme ZonesAll stocksCompareHot stocksOpportunitiesNewsDiscussionWatchlistWhat's newSettingsNewsletterFor writersMCP serverContactLog inSign up

© 2026 Tickwind. Not investment advice.

Made for the curious investor.

Home/Compare

KO vs PG

KO and PG side by side — valuation & fundamentals (public data).

Key statistics

KO vs PG key statistics
MetricKOCOCA COLA COPGPROCTER & GAMBLE Co
Market cap$404.90B$374.48B
P/E (TTM)27.824.3
P/B10.836.77
P/S8.4x4.3x
Dividend yield2.17%2.73%
Revenue$51.05B(TTM)$87.92B(TTM)
Revenue growth (YoY)1.9%3.3%
Net income$14.63B(TTM)$16.03B(TTM)
Earnings growth (YoY)23.3%0.5%
EPS, diluted$3.39(TTM)$6.64(TTM)
EBIT margin28.7%22.7%
ROE35.1%29.0%
ROIC18.4%18.4%
Piotroski F7/9—
1y total return+39.4%+11.0%

Figures from SEC filings · for reference only · not investment advice

Growth of $10,000: KO vs PG

$10.0K$29.1K$25.7K2016-06-292026-10-30
MetricKOPG
End value$29.1K$25.7K
Total return+191.0%+156.5%
CAGR+10.9%+9.5%
Volatility18.3%18.8%
Sharpe0.430.36
Sortino0.600.51
Max drawdown-37.0%-23.8%

Based on 2600 common trading days, 2016-06-29 → 2026-10-30 · risk-free 4.16% (current short-Treasury, held constant)

A head-to-head total-return backtest over real split- and dividend-adjusted prices: how a one-time $10,000 investment in each stock, held to today, would have grown over their common window — including reinvested dividends. A disclosed historical statistic — NOT a prediction, a guarantee, or investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results.

Related comparisons

KO vs PEPPG vs CLKO vs MNSTKDP vs KOKMB vs PGKMB vs KO

Delayed data · Public sources · For reference only · Not investment advice (this page declares no winner)