Tickwind
TodayOpportunitiesMarketsHotNewsAI Chat
What's new
EN
Log inSign up
Tickwind

Read every tick. See where the market's blowing.

Product

  • Markets
  • Theme Zones
  • All stocks
  • Compare
  • Hot stocks
  • Opportunities
  • News
  • Discussion
  • Watchlist
  • What's new

Account

  • Settings
  • Newsletter
  • Contact
  • Log in
  • Sign up
MarketsTheme ZonesAll stocksCompareHot stocksOpportunitiesNewsDiscussionWatchlistWhat's newSettingsNewsletterContactLog inSign up

© 2026 Tickwind. Not investment advice.

Made for the curious investor.

Home/Compare

LRCX vs AMAT

LRCX and AMAT side by side — valuation & fundamentals (public data).

Key statistics

LRCX vs AMAT key statistics
MetricLRCXLAM RESEARCH CORPORATIONAMATAPPLIED MATERIALS INC /DE
Market cap$320.65B$356.79B
P/E (TTM)48.542.3
P/B30.2914.92
P/S18.3x13.3x
Dividend yield0.36%0.39%
Revenue$21.68B(TTM)$29.02B(TTM)
Revenue growth (YoY)23.7%4.4%
Net income$6.71B(TTM)$8.51B(TTM)
Earnings growth (YoY)40.0%-2.5%
EPS, diluted$5.29(TTM)$10.63(TTM)
EBIT margin32.0%29.2%
ROE50.6%29.3%
ROIC51.1%26.0%
Piotroski F9/97/9
1y total return+173.4%+153.7%

Figures from SEC filings · for reference only · not investment advice

Growth of $10,000: LRCX vs AMAT

$10.0K$372.3K$249.3K2016-03-282026-07-29
MetricLRCXAMAT
End value$372.3K$249.3K
Total return+3623.3%+2392.8%
CAGR+41.9%+36.5%
Volatility45.3%43.6%
Sharpe0.910.84
Sortino1.351.23
Max drawdown-56.4%-55.1%

Based on 2600 common trading days, 2016-03-28 → 2026-07-29 · risk-free 3.9% (current short-Treasury, held constant)

A head-to-head total-return backtest over real split- and dividend-adjusted prices: how a one-time $10,000 investment in each stock, held to today, would have grown over their common window — including reinvested dividends. A disclosed historical statistic — NOT a prediction, a guarantee, or investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results.

Related comparisons

AMAT vs LRCXAMAT vs TSMAMAT vs ASMLAMAT vs KLACKLAC vs LRCXASML vs LRCX

Delayed data · Public sources · For reference only · Not investment advice (this page declares no winner)