Tickwind
TodayOpportunitiesMarketsHotNewsAI Chat
What's new
EN
Log inSign up
Tickwind

Read every tick. See where the market's blowing.

Product

  • Markets
  • Theme Zones
  • All stocks
  • Compare
  • Hot stocks
  • Opportunities
  • News
  • Discussion
  • Watchlist
  • What's new

Account

  • Settings
  • Newsletter
  • For writers
  • MCP server
  • Contact
  • Log in
  • Sign up
MarketsTheme ZonesAll stocksCompareHot stocksOpportunitiesNewsDiscussionWatchlistWhat's newSettingsNewsletterFor writersMCP serverContactLog inSign up

© 2026 Tickwind. Not investment advice.

Made for the curious investor.

Home/Compare

MNST vs PEP

MNST and PEP side by side — valuation & fundamentals (public data).

Key statistics

MNST vs PEP key statistics
MetricMNSTMonster Beverage CorpPEPPepsiCo, Inc.
Market cap$45.90B$192.49B
P/E (TTM)17.218.5
P/B4.908.71
P/S5.5x2.0x
Dividend yield—3.97%
Revenue$9.22B(TTM)$96.90B(TTM)
Revenue growth (YoY)10.7%2.3%
Net income$2.13B(TTM)$10.45B(TTM)
Earnings growth (YoY)26.3%-14.0%
EPS, diluted$2.73(TTM)$7.63(TTM)
EBIT margin29.2%12.2%
ROE20.3%37.3%
ROIC25.2%15.3%
Piotroski F—5/9
1y total return+51.0%-0.2%

Figures from SEC filings · for reference only · not investment advice

Growth of $10,000: MNST vs PEP

$10.0K$45.5K$18.8K2016-04-272026-08-28
MetricMNSTPEP
End value$45.5K$18.8K
Total return+355.4%+88.1%
CAGR+15.8%+6.3%
Volatility26.4%19.7%
Sharpe0.540.21
Sortino0.790.30
Max drawdown-30.4%-30.3%

Based on 2600 common trading days, 2016-04-27 → 2026-08-28 · risk-free 3.9% (current short-Treasury, held constant)

A head-to-head total-return backtest over real split- and dividend-adjusted prices: how a one-time $10,000 investment in each stock, held to today, would have grown over their common window — including reinvested dividends. A disclosed historical statistic — NOT a prediction, a guarantee, or investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results.

Related comparisons

KO vs PEPKO vs MNSTKDP vs MNSTKDP vs PEPAAPL vs MSFTGOOGL vs META

Delayed data · Public sources · For reference only · Not investment advice (this page declares no winner)