Tickwind
TodayOpportunitiesMarketsAI Chat
EN
Log inSign up
Tickwind

Read every tick. See where the market's blowing.

  • X
  • TelegramChinese
  • Newsletter

Product

  • Markets
  • Theme Zones
  • All stocks
  • Compare
  • Hot stocks
  • Opportunities
  • News
  • Discussion
  • Watchlist
  • What's new

Account

  • Settings
  • Newsletter
  • For writers
  • MCP server
  • Contact
  • Log in
  • Sign up
MarketsTheme ZonesAll stocksCompareHot stocksOpportunitiesNewsDiscussionWatchlistWhat's newSettingsNewsletterFor writersMCP serverContactLog inSign up

© 2026 Tickwind. Not investment advice.

Made for the curious investor.

Home/Compare

MNST vs PEP

MNST and PEP side by side — valuation & fundamentals (public data).

Key statistics

MNST vs PEP key statistics
MetricMNSTMonster Beverage CorpPEPPEPSICO INC
Market cap$46.38B$187.15B
P/E (TTM)17.317.3
P/B4.958.40
P/S5.6x2.0x
Dividend yield—4.08%
Revenue$9.22B(TTM)$98.24B(TTM)
Revenue growth (YoY)10.7%2.3%
Net income$2.13B(TTM)$10.90B(TTM)
Earnings growth (YoY)26.3%-14.0%
EPS, diluted$2.73(TTM)$7.95(TTM)
EBIT margin29.2%12.2%
ROE20.3%37.0%
ROIC25.2%15.3%
Piotroski F—5/9
1y total return+42.3%—

Figures from SEC filings · for reference only · not investment advice

Growth of $10,000: MNST vs PEP

$10.0K$36.0K$18.3K2016-06-292026-10-30
MetricMNSTPEP
End value$36.0K$18.3K
Total return+260.0%+82.8%
CAGR+13.2%+6.0%
Volatility26.2%19.8%
Sharpe0.450.18
Sortino0.650.26
Max drawdown-30.4%-30.3%

Based on 2600 common trading days, 2016-06-29 → 2026-10-30 · risk-free 4.16% (current short-Treasury, held constant)

A head-to-head total-return backtest over real split- and dividend-adjusted prices: how a one-time $10,000 investment in each stock, held to today, would have grown over their common window — including reinvested dividends. A disclosed historical statistic — NOT a prediction, a guarantee, or investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results.

Related comparisons

KO vs PEPKO vs MNSTKDP vs MNSTKDP vs PEPAAPL vs MSFTGOOGL vs META

Delayed data · Public sources · For reference only · Not investment advice (this page declares no winner)