Tickwind
TodayOpportunitiesMarketsAI Chat
EN
Log inSign up
Tickwind

Read every tick. See where the market's blowing.

  • X
  • TelegramChinese
  • Newsletter

Product

  • Markets
  • Theme Zones
  • All stocks
  • Compare
  • Hot stocks
  • Opportunities
  • News
  • Discussion
  • Watchlist
  • What's new

Account

  • Settings
  • Newsletter
  • For writers
  • MCP server
  • Contact
  • Log in
  • Sign up
MarketsTheme ZonesAll stocksCompareHot stocksOpportunitiesNewsDiscussionWatchlistWhat's newSettingsNewsletterFor writersMCP serverContactLog inSign up

© 2026 Tickwind. Not investment advice.

Made for the curious investor.

Home/Compare

MRK vs ABBV

MRK and ABBV side by side — valuation & fundamentals (public data).

Key statistics

MRK vs ABBV key statistics
MetricMRKMerck & Co., Inc.ABBVAbbVie Inc.
Market cap$362.85B$464.15B
P/E (TTM)117.774.2
P/B8.65—
P/S5.6x7.6x
Dividend yield2.25%2.51%
Revenue$66.57B(TTM)$61.16B(TTM)
Revenue growth (YoY)1.3%8.6%
Net income$3.17B(TTM)$6.31B(TTM)
Earnings growth (YoY)6.6%-1.2%
EPS, diluted$1.25(TTM)$3.54(TTM)
EBIT margin34.2%24.6%
ROE43.5%—
ROIC21.6%18.6%
1y total return+85.3%+22.2%

Figures from SEC filings · for reference only · not investment advice

Growth of $10,000: MRK vs ABBV

$10.0K$37.1K$64.0K2016-05-162026-09-17
MetricMRKABBV
End value$37.1K$64.0K
Total return+270.7%+539.5%
CAGR+13.5%+19.7%
Volatility23.3%25.9%
Sharpe0.480.67
Sortino0.710.93
Max drawdown-43.4%-45.1%

Based on 2600 common trading days, 2016-05-16 → 2026-09-17 · risk-free 4.14% (current short-Treasury, held constant)

A head-to-head total-return backtest over real split- and dividend-adjusted prices: how a one-time $10,000 investment in each stock, held to today, would have grown over their common window — including reinvested dividends. A disclosed historical statistic — NOT a prediction, a guarantee, or investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results.

Related comparisons

PFE vs MRKABBV vs JNJLLY vs MRKABBV vs LLYABBV vs MRKMRK vs NVO

Delayed data · Public sources · For reference only · Not investment advice (this page declares no winner)