Tickwind
TodayOpportunitiesMarketsHotNewsAI Chat
What's new
EN
Log inSign up
Tickwind

Read every tick. See where the market's blowing.

Product

  • Markets
  • Theme Zones
  • All stocks
  • Compare
  • Hot stocks
  • Opportunities
  • News
  • Discussion
  • Watchlist
  • What's new

Account

  • Settings
  • Newsletter
  • Contact
  • Log in
  • Sign up
MarketsTheme ZonesAll stocksCompareHot stocksOpportunitiesNewsDiscussionWatchlistWhat's newSettingsNewsletterContactLog inSign up

© 2026 Tickwind. Not investment advice.

Made for the curious investor.

Home/Compare

PANW vs FTNT

PANW and FTNT side by side — valuation & fundamentals (public data).

Key statistics

PANW vs FTNT key statistics
MetricPANWPALO ALTO NETWORKS, INCFTNTFORTINET, INC.
Market cap$256.18B$112.42B
P/E (TTM)273.359.5
P/B9.26113.59
P/S28.2x16.2x
Revenue$10.61B(TTM)$7.11B(TTM)
Revenue growth (YoY)14.9%14.2%
Net income$842.90M(TTM)$1.95B(TTM)
Earnings growth (YoY)-56.0%6.2%
EPS, diluted$1.15(TTM)$2.58(TTM)
EBIT margin13.5%30.7%
ROE4.1%187.3%
ROIC3.2%—
Piotroski F4/96/9
1y total return+64.6%+43.1%

Figures from SEC filings · for reference only · not investment advice

Growth of $10,000: PANW vs FTNT

$10.0K$120.7K$267.5K2016-03-282026-07-29
MetricPANWFTNT
End value$120.7K$267.5K
Total return+1106.9%+2574.9%
CAGR+27.3%+37.4%
Volatility39.0%40.6%
Sharpe0.720.89
Sortino1.011.29
Max drawdown-48.0%-38.3%

Based on 2600 common trading days, 2016-03-28 → 2026-07-29 · risk-free 3.9% (current short-Treasury, held constant)

A head-to-head total-return backtest over real split- and dividend-adjusted prices: how a one-time $10,000 investment in each stock, held to today, would have grown over their common window — including reinvested dividends. A disclosed historical statistic — NOT a prediction, a guarantee, or investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results.

Related comparisons

CRWD vs PANWPANW vs ZSFTNT vs PANWFTNT vs ZSNET vs PANWAAPL vs MSFT

Delayed data · Public sources · For reference only · Not investment advice (this page declares no winner)