Tickwind
TodayOpportunitiesMarketsAI Chat
EN
Log inSign up
Tickwind

Read every tick. See where the market's blowing.

  • X
  • TelegramChinese
  • Newsletter

Product

  • Markets
  • Theme Zones
  • All stocks
  • Compare
  • Hot stocks
  • Opportunities
  • News
  • Discussion
  • Watchlist
  • What's new

Account

  • Settings
  • Newsletter
  • For writers
  • MCP server
  • Contact
  • Log in
  • Sign up
MarketsTheme ZonesAll stocksCompareHot stocksOpportunitiesNewsDiscussionWatchlistWhat's newSettingsNewsletterFor writersMCP serverContactLog inSign up

© 2026 Tickwind. Not investment advice.

Made for the curious investor.

Home/Compare

ZS vs PANW

ZS and PANW side by side — valuation & fundamentals (public data).

Key statistics

ZS vs PANW key statistics
MetricZSZscaler IncPANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc
Market cap$31.60B$306.82B
P/B12.1611.16
P/S9.4x26.7x
Revenue$3.35B(TTM)$11.48B(TTM)
Revenue growth (YoY)25.4%24.5%
Net income-$63.18M(TTM)$307.00M(TTM)
Earnings growth (YoY)-52.3%-72.9%
EPS, diluted$-0.39(TTM)$0.40(TTM)
EBIT margin-4.0%6.1%
ROE-2.4%1.1%
ROIC-4.7%1.5%
Piotroski F4/94/9
1y total return-32.2%+86.3%

Figures from SEC filings · for reference only · not investment advice

Growth of $10,000: ZS vs PANW

$10.0K$58.8K$120.1K2018-03-162026-09-15
MetricZSPANW
End value$58.8K$120.1K
Total return+487.6%+1100.7%
CAGR+23.2%+34.0%
Volatility58.5%40.1%
Sharpe0.580.83
Sortino0.841.21
Max drawdown-76.4%-48.0%

Based on 2136 common trading days, 2018-03-16 → 2026-09-15 · risk-free 4.11% (current short-Treasury, held constant)

A head-to-head total-return backtest over real split- and dividend-adjusted prices: how a one-time $10,000 investment in each stock, held to today, would have grown over their common window — including reinvested dividends. A disclosed historical statistic — NOT a prediction, a guarantee, or investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results.

Related comparisons

CRWD vs PANWCRWD vs ZSPANW vs ZSS vs ZSFTNT vs PANWFTNT vs ZS

Delayed data · Public sources · For reference only · Not investment advice (this page declares no winner)