Tickwind
TodayOpportunitiesMarketsAI Chat
EN
Log inSign up
Tickwind

Read every tick. See where the market's blowing.

  • X
  • TelegramChinese
  • Newsletter

Product

  • Markets
  • Theme Zones
  • All stocks
  • Compare
  • Hot stocks
  • Opportunities
  • News
  • Discussion
  • Watchlist
  • What's new

Account

  • Settings
  • Newsletter
  • For writers
  • MCP server
  • Contact
  • Log in
  • Sign up
MarketsTheme ZonesAll stocksCompareHot stocksOpportunitiesNewsDiscussionWatchlistWhat's newSettingsNewsletterFor writersMCP serverContactLog inSign up

© 2026 Tickwind. Not investment advice.

Made for the curious investor.

Home/Compare

PEP vs MNST

PEP and MNST side by side — valuation & fundamentals (public data).

Key statistics

PEP vs MNST key statistics
MetricPEPPepsiCo, Inc.MNSTMonster Beverage Corp
Market cap$183.32B$43.68B
P/E (TTM)17.616.3
P/B8.304.66
P/S2.0x5.3x
Dividend yield4.17%—
Revenue$96.90B(TTM)$9.22B(TTM)
Revenue growth (YoY)2.3%10.7%
Net income$10.45B(TTM)$2.13B(TTM)
Earnings growth (YoY)-14.0%26.3%
EPS, diluted$7.63(TTM)$2.73(TTM)
EBIT margin12.2%29.2%
ROE37.3%20.3%
ROIC15.3%25.2%
Piotroski F5/9—
1y total return-0.1%+34.8%

Figures from SEC filings · for reference only · not investment advice

Growth of $10,000: PEP vs MNST

$10.0K$17.8K$36.0K2016-05-132026-09-16
MetricPEPMNST
End value$17.8K$36.0K
Total return+78.3%+260.0%
CAGR+5.8%+13.2%
Volatility19.7%26.1%
Sharpe0.170.45
Sortino0.250.65
Max drawdown-30.3%-30.4%

Based on 2600 common trading days, 2016-05-13 → 2026-09-16 · risk-free 4.11% (current short-Treasury, held constant)

A head-to-head total-return backtest over real split- and dividend-adjusted prices: how a one-time $10,000 investment in each stock, held to today, would have grown over their common window — including reinvested dividends. A disclosed historical statistic — NOT a prediction, a guarantee, or investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results.

Related comparisons

KO vs PEPKO vs MNSTMNST vs PEPKDP vs MNSTKDP vs PEPAAPL vs MSFT

Delayed data · Public sources · For reference only · Not investment advice (this page declares no winner)