PG vs KMB
PG and KMB side by side — valuation & fundamentals (public data).
Key statistics
| Metric | PGThe Procter & Gamble Company | KMBKIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $337.67B | $32.66B |
| P/E (TTM) | 21.9 | 16.7 |
| P/B | 6.22 | 18.66 |
| P/S | 3.9x | 2.0x |
| Dividend yield | 3.03% | 5.08% |
| Revenue | $87.03B(TTM) | $16.58B(TTM) |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 3.3% | -2.1% |
| Net income | $16.05B(TTM) | $1.96B(TTM) |
| Earnings growth (YoY) | 0.5% | -20.6% |
| EPS, diluted | $6.62(TTM) | $5.87(TTM) |
| EBIT margin | 22.7% | 14.3% |
| ROE | 29.5% | 115.5% |
| ROIC | 19.8% | 24.3% |
| Piotroski F | — | 5/9 |
| 1y total return | -5.6% | -20.3% |
Figures from SEC filings · for reference only · not investment advice
Growth of $10,000: PG vs KMB
| Metric | PG | KMB |
|---|---|---|
| End value | $23.3K | $11.0K |
| Total return | +133.1% | +10.1% |
| CAGR | +8.5% | +0.9% |
| Volatility | 18.7% | 21.2% |
| Sharpe | 0.31 | -0.04 |
| Sortino | 0.45 | -0.06 |
| Max drawdown | -23.8% | -34.1% |
Based on 2600 common trading days, 2016-05-10 → 2026-09-11 · risk-free 4.07% (current short-Treasury, held constant)
A head-to-head total-return backtest over real split- and dividend-adjusted prices: how a one-time $10,000 investment in each stock, held to today, would have grown over their common window — including reinvested dividends. A disclosed historical statistic — NOT a prediction, a guarantee, or investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results.
Related comparisons
Delayed data · Public sources · For reference only · Not investment advice (this page declares no winner)